Reasons for The National Bank to force unconstitutional IMF's bill

During the approval of the anti-banking law, the colleagues were given an example of one indicatory decision of the NBU, because of which the central bank officials needed this law. At the moment they are promoting it as “anti-Kolomoisky”. The National Bank revoked the license from the Radical Bank of the Shpak family in November 2015.

 The court declared the NBU’s decision unlawful at the end of May 2019, and obliged the National Bank to pay compensation of UAH 128.9 million to the shareholders of Radical Bank.

In the meanwhile, a criminal case concerning the abuse of office and losses to the state in a particularly high amount was opened against the leadership of the NBU –Gontareva, Smoliy, Rozhkov. This criminal case against the “Poroshenko gang”, who plundered the banking system between 2014 and 2019, is set to disappear after the adoption of the anti-banking law.

As a result, the officials of the National Bank are actively lobbying this law in Rada to avoid responsibility. And there is nothing surprising as they simply do not want to go to prison.

Another serious issue is that the Office of the President, the leadership of Verkhovna Rada, and the financial committee of the Parliament are devotedly supporting the “Poroshenko-Gontareva gang”.

However, it is enough to admit that our task is an acquittal of Poroshenko. And no questions are being asked.

Isn’t that exactly what we promised the voters?

Comments